41st Annual Competition Policy Conference: Balancing rules-based competition policy and economic security
News
17 Nov 2024
Competition
41st Annual Competition Policy Conference: Balancing rules-based competition policy and economic security

This year’s Annual Competition Policy Conference ‘Competition policy and economic security’, took place on Thursday, 14 November. The conference focused on how to balance a rules-based approach to competition policy with a more geopolitically-driven model. Malte Lohan, CEO and Elsa Sependa (AT&T), Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU kicked off the event by underling the need for effective and fair competition rules to ensure that Europe remains attractive and competitive on the global stage. During the event, we heard from Damien Gérard, Prosecutor General, Belgian Competition Authority who presented the Belgian Competition Authority’s approach of using competition policy to speed up the development of digital infrastructure. 

The first panel was an examination of how geopolitical trends shape regulation. Our panelists explored the numerous geoeconomic challenges facing the EU and how competition policy can be employed alongside other policy tools to address these challenges. During the panel we heard from Maria Demertzis, Director, Economic Strategy and Finance Program, The Conference Board Europe; Aura Salla, MEP (EPP, FI); Koen Van de Casteele, Director, State aid: General Scrutiny and Enforcement, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission and Astri Van Dyke, Director, Global Competition Policy, Google. Ioannis Lianos, Professor, Competition Law and Policy, University College London moderated the discussion while also setting the scene by giving a historical view of competition policy developments from around the world. 

The second panel of the day looked at economic security, where our speakers considered the role national security plays in transaction screening. Moderated by Natalie McNelis, Senior Correspondent, MLex, the panel discussed the complexities around merger control rules and how a coordinated approach between Member States will make it easier for investment to make its way into the EU. Attendees heard from Ief Daems, Legal Director of Antitrust, Cisco; Chair, In-House Competition Lawyers Association (ICLA); Steffen Hindelang, Director and Co-Founder, CELIS Institute and Professor, International Investment and Trade Law, Uppsala University; Francesco Macchiaroli, General Counsel, Avio Aero and Aiste Slezeviciute, incoming Head of Sector, Foreign Direct Investment Screening, Directorate-General for Trade, European Commission 

Thank you to Elsa Sependa (AT&T) Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU for moderating the event, as well as our sponsor Baker Botts and our media partner MLex. 

Related items

Blog
3 Apr 2026

FSR compliance: ​complexity undermining competitiveness​

The EU proposed the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) in 2021 to address foreign subsidies distorting the Single Market. Operating as a screening instrument behind merger control, it requires companies to notify the European Commission of foreign financial contributions (FFCs) they may receive when participating in public procurement or mergers and acquisitions activity. Preventing FFCs from distorting the Single Market is an important goal – and one that must be achieved without creating its own disruptions.

Competition
Read more
Read more about FSR compliance: ​complexity undermining competitiveness​
News
3 Mar 2026

Delivering coherence in Europe’s foreign investment screening framework

Will Europe choose alignment or fragmentation in foreign investment screening? In a recent blog for fDi Intelligence, Malte Lohan, CEO, and Andrew Hill, Senior Policy Adviser, AmCham EU, examine how divergent national regimes have created legal uncertainty and unnecessary administrative burden for investors and authorities alike. Today’s patchwork encourages over-notification, overwhelms regulators with low-risk cases and introduces avoidable friction for capital. The revised EU Foreign Investment Screening Regulation presents an opportunity to enhance coherence and competitiveness. Its success will depend on consistent implementation across Member States. Convergence would streamline beneficial investment and strengthen the Single Market, while gold-plating risks renewed fragmentation. Read the full op-ed in fDi Intelligence’s Economic Security Watch.

Competition
Read more
Read more about Delivering coherence in Europe’s foreign investment screening framework
Position Paper
11 Feb 2026

An effective, competitive and quality-driven Public Procurement Directive

The revision of the Public Procurement Directive (PPD) is a critical opportunity to unlock the full value of public procurement for European competitiveness and resilience. A simpler, more consistent and quality-driven framework would strengthen market access, attract a wider range of bidders and enable public buyers to select best-in-class solutions. 

The revision should prioritise practical ‘how to buy’ reforms, including digitalisation, standardised templates and reusable documentation, to reduce administrative burdens and increase participation. In parallel, ‘what to buy’ reforms should focus on transparent and verifiable criteria that reward performance, security and life-cycle value while avoiding unnecessary complexity that risks reducing competition. 

Learn how, if designed effectively, the PPD can support innovation, resilience and better outcomes for public buyers across the EU. 

Competition
Read more
Read more about An effective, competitive and quality-driven Public Procurement Directive